IPR and access rights of various kinds may be associated with the digital objects. According to OAIS, the digital archive has to “obtain sufficient control for preservation”. The problems of assuming sufficient control of the Content Information and Preservation Description Information, when they are largely digital, are addressed in three related categories, as follows:
- copyright implications, intellectual property and other legal restrictions on use;
- authority to modify Representation Information;
- agreements with external organizations.
|
Asset base |
|||
| Issue | WP/Project/Tools/Services | Asset | Evidence |
|
DRM is used in a broad and a narrow sense: can be implemented inside or outside the file that is being protected |
APARSEN WP31 |
[Download not found] an extensive overview of DRM techniques and tools and their risks for the long term preservation |
|
|
DRM mechanisms that are built into file formats like the protection for viewing, copying, printing and altering can prevent necessary digital preservation actions |
APARSEN WP31 |
[Download not found] a guideline for dealing with DRM protected material and its preservation |
|
|
There is no standard workflow in the Ingest workflow to check if the digital objects are protected |
APARSEN WP31, tools for generating technical metadata and file analysing like FITS, JHOVE, ExifTool, WP21 (Characterization service) |
overview of appropriate best practices from the workflow perspective, i.e. the use of automated tools for the detection of DRM protected material and its preservation |
|
|
Preservation of digital rights that are associated with digital objects |
APARSEN WP31, PREMIS, METS rights, Europeana Data Model |
Overview of metadata standards that allow the including of digital rights information Mets Rights: Rights Declaration Schema http://www.loc.gov/standards/rights/ PREMIS Rights entity |
OAIS: http://public.ccsds.org/publications/archive/650x0m2.pdf, page 3-1, 3-2. |
|
Use of persistent identifiers in rights management |
LCC project |
|
Gaps |